<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox No Protection From WhenU</title>
	<link>http://affiliatefairplay.com/newsblog/2006/07/15/firefox-no-protection-from-whenu/</link>
	<description>Resources For Fair Practices In Affiliate Marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 13:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Mickey Fansher</title>
		<link>http://affiliatefairplay.com/newsblog/2006/07/15/firefox-no-protection-from-whenu/#comment-579996</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 00:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://affiliatefairplay.com/newsblog/2006/07/15/firefox-no-protection-from-whenu/#comment-579996</guid>
					<description>Good – I should certainly pronounce, impressed with your site. I had no trouble navigating through all tabs as well as related information ended up being truly easy to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it at all. Quite unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or anything, web site theme . a tones way for your customer to communicate. Excellent task.&amp;#124;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good – I should certainly pronounce, impressed with your site. I had no trouble navigating through all tabs as well as related information ended up being truly easy to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it at all. Quite unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or anything, web site theme . a tones way for your customer to communicate. Excellent task.|
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: online printing</title>
		<link>http://affiliatefairplay.com/newsblog/2006/07/15/firefox-no-protection-from-whenu/#comment-503590</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://affiliatefairplay.com/newsblog/2006/07/15/firefox-no-protection-from-whenu/#comment-503590</guid>
					<description>In the awesome scheme of things you get  an A just for effort. Exactly where you lost me was first in your specifics. You know,  they say, the devil is in the details... And that couldn't be much more correct in this article. Having said that, permit me say to you what did give good results. Your article (parts of it) is extremely convincing which is most likely the reason why I am making an effort to opine. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. Second, while I can see a leaps in logic you make, I am definitely not convinced of exactly how you seem to unite the details which in turn make your final result. For now I shall subscribe to your position however hope in the future you actually link the dots better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the awesome scheme of things you get  an A just for effort. Exactly where you lost me was first in your specifics. You know,  they say, the devil is in the details&#8230; And that couldn&#8217;t be much more correct in this article. Having said that, permit me say to you what did give good results. Your article (parts of it) is extremely convincing which is most likely the reason why I am making an effort to opine. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. Second, while I can see a leaps in logic you make, I am definitely not convinced of exactly how you seem to unite the details which in turn make your final result. For now I shall subscribe to your position however hope in the future you actually link the dots better.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Adware Immune</title>
		<link>http://affiliatefairplay.com/newsblog/2006/07/15/firefox-no-protection-from-whenu/#comment-135785</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 04:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://affiliatefairplay.com/newsblog/2006/07/15/firefox-no-protection-from-whenu/#comment-135785</guid>
					<description>The situation you described is not one of a lack of Firefox protection, but a user problem: The adware was installed by the user. Once adware was already on the system, almost anything goes.

Problem 1: Using IE as default browser.
Problem 2: downloading software and not scanning it before install.
Possible problem 3 (may not be in your situation): do all work from an account with admin rights.

If the user is guilty of the above, the user is solely responsible for any trash their system has! No mercy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The situation you described is not one of a lack of Firefox protection, but a user problem: The adware was installed by the user. Once adware was already on the system, almost anything goes.</p>
<p>Problem 1: Using IE as default browser.<br />
Problem 2: downloading software and not scanning it before install.<br />
Possible problem 3 (may not be in your situation): do all work from an account with admin rights.</p>
<p>If the user is guilty of the above, the user is solely responsible for any trash their system has! No mercy.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

